ADS Goes Here
ADS Goes Here

The Paradox Of The Great Acceleration Of Gravity On The Surface Of A Neutron Star





In a neutron star with mass Mns = 1,4MS (MS = Solar mass) and radius Rns = 10 Km, the acceleration of gravity at the surface, of which comply with existing theory, is:



This means a body that performs free fall on the surface will change its speed during
      ΔU = 1,85859 ∙ 10 ^ 12 m / s
at every second.
This speed but is much greater than the speed of light
       C = 300000 Km / s = 3 ∙ 10 ^ 8 m / s
       ΔU / C = 6000
But nothing can move with greater speed of light and here we see the weakness of the existing theory.

CALCULATION THE ACCELERATION OF GRAVITY ON THE SURFACE OF A NEUTRON STAR WITH THE USE THE NEW WORLD  CONSTANT OF GRAVITY GN.

In a neutron star with mass Mns = 1,4MS  and radius Rns = 10 Km, the acceleration of gravity at the surface gns, will comply with the


So that is the acceleration of gravity at the surface of the above neutron star and as shown is smaller than the Earth by 7.74 times.
Let us not forget that the Earth has as its core a neutron star with a radius of 1278 Km.

In a neutron star with mass Mns = 1,4MS  and radius Rns = 10 Km, the acceleration of gravity at the surface gns, will comply with the new GN

So that is the acceleration of gravity at the surface of the above neutron star and as shown is smaller than the Earth by 7.74 times.
Let us not forget that the Earth has as its core a neutron star with a radius of 1278 Km.

​So we see that the current world today gravitational constant


It can not be applied to the surface of a neutron star. So if we accept the existence of neutron stars as existent heavenly bodies according to the observations of astrophysical, then we need to look for a new global gravitational constant that applies to the entire universe.
The new universal constant of gravitation proposed here


believe that satisfies this condition.



Source : NEW COSMOS
By George Georgitzikis

The MOON core has a density similar to a Neutron Star





CALCULATING THE MASS OF THE MOON WITH THE USE OF NEW 





CALCULATING THE RADIUS AND VOLUME OF THE MOON BEFORE 4.6 BILLION YEARS.



CALCULATING THE EXPANSION OF THE MOON.



Accordingly, the Moon constantly expands for 4.6 billion years, the same procedure described for the Earth in a previous article, except that on the Moon, the volume rate of change per year per Kg initial neutron mass, appears to be greater than that of the Earth:

The MOON core Has a density similar to a Neutron Star

This is likely due to the lack of atmosphere on the moon resulting in faster cooling, unlike the earth, where the atmosphere acts as an insulating layer. Even thicker mantle Earth and the thicker crust together with the body of water of oceans is an additional insulating layer which slows down heat loss and cooling.

A further indication of the expansion Moon, are the dark areas of the surface, the so-called "seas", corresponding to the Earth's oceanic crust is obviously younger than the light areas of the surface.

Observing the photos below, we see that the number of craters in the dark areas of the surface is much smaller than in the light areas of the surface.



Source : NEW COSMOS
By George Georgitzikis

In The Center Of The SUN There Is a Neutron Star






CALCULATION OF SOLAR MASS, CONSIDERING THE EXISTENCE OF A NEUTRON STAR IN THE CENTER.

For this calculation we will use the new constant universal gravitation GN, as calculated in the previous article.
The centrifugal force of the Earth due to the behavior around the Sun, is equal and opposite to the Sun-Earth tractive force.
Where:




This mass is also higher by 1,466940x10^12  times the current permissible mass of the Sun.


CALCULATION OF THE INITIAL VOLUME AND THE INITIAL RADIUS OF THE SUN AS A NEUTRON STAR.


​If the above mass of the Sun turned into a neutron star with a density ρ =10^15 gr/cm3 ,  then 4.6 billion years ago the original volume of the Sun would:



This is approximately the current radius of the Sun's inner core, which retains the density of a neutron star.

CALCULATION OF CHANGES IN VOLUME OF THE SUN FROM THE DATE CREATION.


The expansion process then is similar to that of the Earth, only about rapidly in the Sun, due to the greater initial mass of the neutron star and the lack of insulating layers, which would prevent cooling.

Accordingly the Sun continually expanded for 4.6 billion years by the same procedure described for the Earth in the previous article, except that the Sun due to the greater initial mass of the neutron star, has created a liquid outer core comprising heavy metals in the inner layers and lighter non-metallic elements to the outer layers and then all of the above are surrounded by a gaseous crust mainly consisting of hydrogen and helium that is known photosphere.

Possibly in layers deeper the photosphere, occurring consecutive fusions, increasingly heavy elements until the iron level, while still deeper we found evidence even heavier, which will not now come from nuclear fusion, but by nuclear fissions super massive metals.
After a few billion years the Sun will have a structure similar to the Earth, that will create mantle and outer bark with oceans and atmosphere the composition of which will not necessarily be like the Earth.
And in this situation will remain for the next billion years as an "Old man Sun" until the next cosmic collision with another star and the creation of a supernova, where the cycle starts again from the beginning with the creation of a new solar planetary system.


Source : NEW COSMOS
By George Georgitzikis


NASA Telescope Reveals Largest Batch of Earth-Size, Habitable-Zone Planets Around Single Star




NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope has revealed the first known system of seven Earth-size planets around a single star. Three of these planets are firmly located in the habitable zone, the area around the parent star where a rocky planet is most likely to have liquid water.

The discovery sets a new record for greatest number of habitable-zone planets found around a single star outside our solar system. All of these seven planets could have liquid water — key to life as we know it — under the right atmospheric conditions, but the chances are highest with the three in the habitable zone.

"This discovery could be a significant piece in the puzzle of finding habitable environments, places that are conducive to life," said Thomas Zurbuchen, associate administrator of the agency's Science Mission Directorate in Washington. "Answering the question 'are we alone' is a top science priority and finding so many planets like these for the first time in the habitable zone is a remarkable step forward toward that goal."

At about 40 light-years (235 trillion miles) from Earth, the system of planets is relatively close to us, in the constellation Aquarius. Because they are located outside of our solar system, these planets are scientifically known as exoplanets.

This exoplanet system is called TRAPPIST-1, named for The Transiting Planets and Planetesimals Small Telescope (TRAPPIST) in Chile. In May 2016, researchers using TRAPPIST announced they had discovered three planets in the system. Assisted by several ground-based telescopes, including the European Southern Observatory's Very Large Telescope, Spitzer confirmed the existence of two of these planets and discovered five additional ones, increasing the number of known planets in the system to seven.

The new results were published Wednesday in the journal Nature, and announced at a news briefing at NASA Headquarters in Washington.

Using Spitzer data, the team precisely measured the sizes of the seven planets and developed first estimates of the masses of six of them, allowing their density to be estimated.

Based on their densities, all of the TRAPPIST-1 planets are likely to be rocky. Further observations will not only help determine whether they are rich in water, but also possibly reveal whether any could have liquid water on their surfaces. The mass of the seventh and farthest exoplanet has not yet been estimated — scientists believe it could be an icy, "snowball-like" world, but further observations are needed.

"The seven wonders of TRAPPIST-1 are the first Earth-size planets that have been found orbiting this kind of star," said Michael Gillon, lead author of the paper and the principal investigator of the TRAPPIST exoplanet survey at the University of Liege, Belgium. "It is also the best target yet for studying the atmospheres of potentially habitable, Earth-size worlds."

In contrast to our sun, the TRAPPIST-1 star - classified as an ultra-cool dwarf — is so cool that liquid water could survive on planets orbiting very close to it, closer than is possible on planets in our solar system. All seven of the TRAPPIST-1 planetary orbits are closer to their host star than Mercury is to our sun. The planets also are very close to each other. If a person was standing on one of the planet's surface, they could gaze up and potentially see geological features or clouds of neighboring worlds, which would sometimes appear larger than the moon in Earth's sky.

The planets may also be tidally locked to their star, which means the same side of the planet is always facing the star, therefore each side is either perpetual day or night. This could mean they have weather patterns totally unlike those on Earth, such as strong winds blowing from the day side to the night side, and extreme temperature changes.

Spitzer, an infrared telescope that trails Earth as it orbits the sun, was well-suited for studying TRAPPIST-1 because the star glows brightest in infrared light, whose wavelengths are longer than the eye can see. In the fall of 2016, Spitzer observed TRAPPIST-1 nearly continuously for 500 hours. Spitzer is uniquely positioned in its orbit to observe enough crossing — transits — of the planets in front of the host star to reveal the complex architecture of the system. Engineers optimized Spitzer's ability to observe transiting planets during Spitzer's "warm mission," which began after the spacecraft's coolant ran out as planned after the first five years of operations.

"This is the most exciting result I have seen in the 14 years of Spitzer operations," said Sean Carey, manager of NASA's Spitzer Science Center at Caltech/IPAC in Pasadena, California. "Spitzer will follow up in the fall to further refine our understanding of these planets so that the James Webb Space Telescope can follow up. More observations of the system are sure to reveal more secrets."

Following up on the Spitzer discovery, NASA's Hubble Space Telescope has initiated the screening of four of the planets, including the three inside the habitable zone. These observations aim at assessing the presence of puffy, hydrogen-dominated atmospheres, typical for gaseous worlds like Neptune, around these planets.

In May 2016, the Hubble team observed the two innermost planets, and found no evidence for such puffy atmospheres. This strengthened the case that the planets closest to the star are rocky in nature.

"The TRAPPIST-1 system provides one of the best opportunities in the next decade to study the atmospheres around Earth-size planets," said Nikole Lewis, co-leader of the Hubble study and astronomer at the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore, Maryland. NASA's planet-hunting Kepler space telescope also is studying the TRAPPIST-1 system, making measurements of the star's minuscule changes in brightness due to transiting planets. Operating as the K2 mission, the spacecraft's observations will allow astronomers to refine the properties of the known planets, as well as search for additional planets in the system. The K2 observations conclude in early March and will be made available on the public archive.

Spitzer, Hubble, and Kepler will help astronomers plan for follow-up studies using NASA's upcoming James Webb Space Telescope, launching in 2018. With much greater sensitivity, Webb will be able to detect the chemical fingerprints of water, methane, oxygen, ozone, and other components of a planet's atmosphere. Webb also will analyze planets' temperatures and surface pressures — key factors in assessing their habitability.

NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in Pasadena, California, manages the Spitzer Space Telescope mission for NASA's Science Mission Directorate. Science operations are conducted at the Spitzer Science Center, at Caltech, in Pasadena, California. Spacecraft operations are based at Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company, Littleton, Colorado. Data are archived at the Infrared Science Archive housed at Caltech/IPAC. Caltech manages JPL for NASA..

Credit : NASA and JPL/Caltech
Source : Hubble Site

Which Telescope Should I Buy?




If you go out to any telescope store you will see many stores owner will try to sell you a small and cheap telescope by saying it has 600X magnification and it can show craters in moons, Jupiter's belt, Saturn rings, etc... not only this they will also show you the original box which has wonderful colored pictures of planets, galaxies, nebulae and much more. Beware of all these telescopes because the wonderful colored pictures that you saw in original box was all taken from Hubble Space Telescope. In real it will not look like the pictures you saw in original box. This will hurt your interest and curiosity of being a Amateur Astronomer. Due to this reason many new comers who comes to astronomy worlds get hurts and leave the wonderful astronomy world without knowing the real facts. So, always be aware not to fall into the trap of those telescope stores owners. 

Before buying your first telescope keep in mind few things

1. Never buy any telescope without knowing anything about it. I suggest you to visit your nearest astronomy clubs. Look through different peoples telescopes with different eyepieces to know what eyepieces are and what they do. Discuss with them what you want to see they can help you out in getting a good telescope.
"For ex - Watching moons craters, planets, planetary details like watching Jupiter's belts, Saturn's ring or interested in Deep Space Objects (DSO's) like galaxies, nebulae, star clusters or something like this."

The best thing is that without wasting your huge money just buy a used telescope and learn something from it and plan for your future one which you really want and at best price.

2. Never buy your telescope from a toy store or from a un-reputable seller. You may get some telescope at cheaper price but their optics quality will be very very poor and this will disappoint you and nothing else. So, always select your telescope from a reputable dealer.

3. Never fall into the trap of a seller who is convincing you to buy a telescope which he is claiming to be of superior quality. Its always better to visit your nearest astronomy clubs. Look through different peoples telescopes with different eyepieces to know what eyepieces are and what they do. Discuss with them what you want to see they can help you out in getting a good telescope.

4. Always visit to reputable telescope dealer who has good knowledge about it. A good dealer will ask your requirements and he will give his best to choose a telescope you need.

All the informations mentioned above should be followed.
_________________________________________________________________________________________

Before buying any telescope you should know few important things about it. Without having proper knowledge it is foolish to buy any telescope.


Aperture

Aperture is the most most important part of any telescope. Get the bigger aperture till you can afford it. Aperture is the diameter of the mirror or lens that collects light. In simple words, just compare it with our eyes. We cant see much distant planets because they are far away and when it comes to galaxies, they the most far away objects. Our eye is unable to see them because the light coming from distant planets or galaxies is beyond our eye range. Our eyes can not collect enough light from distant objects as it is small. We need certain things that work as a bigger eye, which we call it as mirror or lens. 

The bigger the diameter of mirrors or lens the more light it collects. Lens or mirrors works as a big eye and collects light from distant objects. The more light it collects the more details of that objects we can see.
Its simple!!!!

Magnification of any telescopes depends on its aperture. Large aperture collects more light and gives higher magnification and greater resolution(good quality images). So, those cheap telescopes offering high magnification will show some satisfactory view of nearer objects like Moon along with its craters, Jupiter along with its four moons, etc.... but those distant object will look fuzzy because these cheap telescopes aperture is not large enough to support high magnification and to show vivid details of that distant objects.

So, always keep in mind to go for larger aperture. Get the bigger aperture till you can afford it.
_________________________________________________________________________________________

Eyepiece


ADS Goes Here